“Our Democracy,” as they speak of it, with a capital “O” and capital “D,” has its own mythos. Can you build a national identity around shame and self-hatred, or, more accurately, hatred of white people who created and sustain this country?
![aruna khilanani ethnicity aruna khilanani ethnicity](https://militaryveteransofdisqus.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/aruna-1-230x182.png)
Let’s think about the theory of this supposed “multiracial, multiethnic democracy.” What will hold it together? Given the nationwide wave of iconoclasm, it seems that our new nation is going to be built on contempt for the old. Why must we go on an admittedly perilous journey to a, quote, “fully functioning multiracial democracy?” Has such a chimera ever existed? How is South Africa doing these days?įorget practicality for a minute. We weren’t there in 1865 in the smoke, ashes and shadow of the Civil War, and not even in the wake of the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act a half-century ago. No matter what you’ve heard or what you’ve been told, we aren’t there yet. Rittenhouse’s story is a microcosm of what America is facing, a perilous journey toward becoming something the world has never known: a fully functioning multiracial, multiethnic democracy emerging from the blood of slaves, the genocide of Native Americans and the notion that all men are created equal. Consider what NBC’s Isaac Bailey has to say about Kyle Rittenhouse: Progressives also see this as “the line” in some sense. He did nothing wrong by defending Americans when their own government abandoned them. The Rittenhouse case must be the line for us - it is a case of truth versus falsehood, right versus wrong, and we demand he be freed. Their so-called principles don’t extend to basic constitutional rights.
![aruna khilanani ethnicity aruna khilanani ethnicity](http://deranaarunalk.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/27113813/48429780_228442998084954_4019843197235625984_n.jpg)
![aruna khilanani ethnicity aruna khilanani ethnicity](https://www.b.wikiage.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Sonnie-Johnson-Wikipedia-Age-Husband-Net-Worth-Podcast-And-Bio-326x245.jpg)
The other side has no compunctions about considering whites that don’t completely bend to their will as enemies. Or, as Carl Schmitt would put it, it is centered on the question of friend and enemy. (Credit Image: © Michael Brochstein / ZUMA Press Wire) Representative Hakeem Jeffries speaking at a press conference of the House Democratic caucus. Defund The Prison Industrial Complex.” On November 10, 2021, he tweeted: “Lock up Kyle Rittenhouse and throw away the key.” Hakeem Jeffries says, or, at least what he said on June 29, 2020. Some representatives seem to defend subjective law. Consider what Rep. We can’t avoid the law.Ĭritical race theory is corrupting the legal system already. We can avoid certain universities perhaps, though the ideas from those places will sweep through American society. It’s not a matter for amusement that our university system produces so-called elites of such mediocrity. Taylor has more sophisticated rhetoric and arguments than “Professor Crunk.” Taylor previously quoted from some of the penetrating insights of Professor Brittney Cooper of Rutgers University, including her call to “take those mother****ers out.” I would suggest that Mr. Well, that’s what passes for a lecture at a university these days. Perhaps we can be grateful that she is only “relatively” guiltless. Aruna Khilanani’s fantasies included “unloading a revolver into the head of any White person that got in my way, burying their body and wiping my bloody hands as I walked away relatively guiltless with a bounce in my step.” I suppose I must agree that we need to have a serious conversation about minority mental health. What do professors at a university speak like? Well, I quote a Washington Post article from June 2021:Ī psychiatrist who told a Yale School of Medicine audience that she fantasized about killing White people defended her April comments this week and called them hyperbole that underlies a frustration about minority mental health and a desire to have more serious conversations about race. Still, let’s consider this idea that this is an academic “façade.” After all, in their words, “Taylor speaks like he’s giving a lecture at a university.” I hope the reporter doesn’t get in trouble.
![aruna khilanani ethnicity aruna khilanani ethnicity](https://thejewishvoice.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/New-York-NYC-Shrink-article-600x361.jpg)
I also note in passing the implicit admission that race actually exists. Well, given that I haven’t seen an American Renaissance conference that’s segregated, I think that’s a bit much. They accused us of promoting “racist ideas” under a “façade.” I quote: “American Renaissance wants complete segregation and believes an entire race’s value can be measured by statistics like crime rates and births out of wedlock.” This is from WPLN News, Nashville Public Radio. Video of the speech is available here.īefore I begin, I’d like to quote what Regime Media has to say about us. This is adapted from remarks given at the 18th American Renaissance conference on November 13, 2021.